Do you get it?

It's not an easy thing to get clear on. 'Cause it involves an acceptance of a denial of our visceral desire to see Obama blast away the long stream of lies coming out of McCain's mouth and Rove's outfit.

But if you want to see why Obama is winning this election, you'll need to see this clearly:

   When Obama ducks opportunities to "score points" on McCain ...

   Obama wins!

Every single one of us feels it. Repeatedly. Over and over. We all FEEL the same thing.

McCain takes a dig at the O for, say, voting "Present."

As our blood boils, we are all yelling at the TV screen: "Barrack, hit him on this. Don't let this bastard get away with this shit. Hammer him on the fact that he has missed hundreds of Senate votes including the vote on the GI Bill!"

Then Obama lets it slide. And we all feel that he missed the chance. We feel disappointed. We feel robbed of a chance to feel that justice was done.

After the debate, Olberman asked Rachel if McCain had slipped some punches. Rachel gave a very savvy answer about how in a debate one has to instantly make a determination: do I actually accomplish more by rebutting or by letting it slip away. Excellent point.

Then Rachel did what we all do. She expressed her personal frustration at Obama giving McCain credit for fighting the torture ban. Rachel is 100% right on this. This is PRECISELY what we all feel dozens of times in these debates. The live blog threads are full of moments where one of us vents: "Obama missed one there! Why can't he nail McCain on X? Or Y? Or Z?"

And Rachel forgot for just a moment what we all forget as we vent.

Obama won by letting McCain off the hook on torture!

Think of it. Suppose Obama nailed McCain on torture. He'd be right and we'd feel good.

But John  McCain is a Viet Nam vet and a guy who did heavy time as a POW. Obama has not served in uniform. Who is going to win that argument? Do you think the FACTS and the JUSTICE of the situation will let Barrack win that one?

Of course not. Barrack gushes over McCain's stance on torture ... and wins the debate by lots of points!

Barrack often does not give his supporters what they most want to hear. And, though an African American man with a name that sounds Arab, he is leading the POW by 12 points! It's time we supporters clearly GOT IT: he is not out to give us what we want to hear. He is out to win!

Meanwhile, McCain gave his supporters red meat tonight. And got hammered.

Look. The pundits never seem to get it. Buchanan is still saying McCain "won on points." CNN pundits talk about Obama having been "flat" all night. Yadda, yadda, yadda. Meanwhile, Obama won big.

At least we, his supporters, should begin to get clear on this! Barrack is winning BECAUSE HE IS DOING IT HIS WAY! If he ever starts meeting our emotional needs, he'll probably start to lose.

Now, there is another side to this, and it's pretty important. It's something you'd better get used to.

When he is President, Barrack is going to frustrate you!

You might as well get used to it. Barrack is NOT a partisan progressive. And he is more than a pragmatist.

The essence of Barrack's political persona is mediation. Negotiation. Transcendence. Reconciliation. That is what he believes in and what he is out to do. He is out to disarm conflict, find common ground, and build a synthetic consensus. He is a walking Hegelian.

This is how he built a powerful following. It is how he beat Hillary. It is how he is beating McCain.

And we'd better understand that it will be how he governs. he will mediate and compromise and make deals. And WE will be frustrated by this. He is far from the ideologue many progressives think he is.

Personally, I am very glad about this, even though I know I will be frustrated by the man. Here''s why.

America today is a hollow shell of itself. It has no wealth, no power, no clout based on anything other than global memory of its past. In the looming economic meltdown, the only thing that keeps America afloat is the tolerance and patience of the people who carry its debt.

I'll put it quite simply.

Only a master NEGOTIATOR has any chance of weaving a transitional course through the monsoons ahead. Only a MEDIATOR is going to be able to shift labor and trade policies back to the American worker and away from China and Japan and Europe and India ... and SIMULTANEOUSLY convince China and Japan and Europe to carry our debt long enough to let us rebuild our economy. The economic survival of the nation depends on a President who as one of world history's great consensus builders can rebuild America's standing in a political, economic, and military world which has had abundant experience of its bankruptcy.

This is why I believe Obama is the best possible person to serve as President in our time of national crisis. Obama is exactly what we need to remain alive as a nation.

But he won't do that by massaging our political erogenous zones. In fact, he will frustrate us. Many times.

Do you get it?


Poll
Have you understood that Barrack is about consensus, not partisan battle?
Yes, and I have made my peace with it.
Yes, but I worry that he will compromise too much.
I'm working on it but I haven't got there yet.
No, I still can't get used to Obama's concessions to the enemy.
Rugby is a better game to watch than American football.

Votes: 26
Results : Vote Link : Polls

Display:


I hear ya (2.00 / 5)

But there's only one R in Barack.


by JJE on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 01:16:29 AM EST

Massaging our political erogenous zones (2.00 / 3)

A comment worthy of introspection.

MyDD sure does that, I'll admit.
As do Dkos, TPM, HuffPost.
And Maddow. And Olbermann. And Stewart. And Colbert.
Quite an orgy, and that's just on the democratic side.

Are we just suckers for stimulation?


It is not because I cannot explain that you won't understand. It is because you won't understand that I cannot explain. - Elie Wiesel
by Sumo Vita on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 01:51:42 AM EST

We've been crawling through the desert... (2.00 / 1)

...and we're dying for some water.  Can you blame us for wallowing in the first pool we find?


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 09:37:57 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do you get it? (2.00 / 3)

I got it, and that's one of the reasons why I supported Obama early on.  He's a conciliator, not a fighter.  When he talks about bringing people together, he really means it.  Doesn't mean he's not a progressive.  He clearly is.  It's just that his style of governing is in a very different mode from what we're used to in national politics.  


by ProfessorReo on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 02:25:28 AM EST

Re: Do you get it? (2.00 / 6)

I was sitting there tonight thinking "this is what comes of having a lawyer as a politician."  

Ticking off his points with hand/finger gestures and counting them out loud is a device that helps drive your argument home to a listener.  Obama constantly does this.

Trial lawyers also learn very quickly that not all objections are good objections.  You will get multiple opportunities to make them, and frequent objections will break up an opponent's flow, but they also hurt your perception in the eyes of the jury if overused.  So you don't make every objection you can out of strategic interest.

McCain's a warrior, and so everything to him is a fight.  If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.  I agree that right now America doesn't need a fighter, it needs an advocate that has more tools in their box.


by lowdog on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 02:29:51 AM EST

Re: Do you get it? (2.00 / 3)

This is but one aspect of Obama's Post-Partisan philosophy of governance. I embraced it months ago, and have watched with bemusement as the numerous "He Must" and "He Has To" and "If He Doesn't" diaries and comments have been proven wrong over and over again.

Only the machines can help Twitchy McFail steal his way into the White House now.


"But not me personally were those cheers for"
by QTG on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 06:53:44 AM EST

Re: Do you get it? (2.00 / 1)

I believe this quote from today's Boston Globe op-ed sums up the state of the race perfectly:

"IT'S OVER. John McCain still hasn't told the country why he should be president.

He has talking points. He is against taxes, earmarks, and pork. But he can't knit what he opposes into a coherent economic philosophy that would inspire voters to get behind him in the final days of this presidential campaign.

He has an inspirational life story. But in this campaign, he never connected his biography to his presidential ambition, and he never told voters how it would shape a McCain administration and make him a better president than his opponent.

McCain has long years of political experience, exactly what Democrat Barack Obama lacks. But McCain is unable to explain why his experience makes him better able to lead the country."

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editor ial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/10/16/tha ts_it_for_mccain/


by phoenixdreamz on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 08:36:33 AM EST

I'm a pragmatist. (2.00 / 2)

I support Barack's pragmatism.  Given the challenges we face in the years ahead - fiscally and globally we need a pragmatist at the helm.

For an aging 60's radical (me) to make this statement is amazing.

I wonder if it's the coffee I drink these days?  


Anthropologists for human diversity; opposing racism,sexism,homophobism, ageism and ethnocentrism.
by NeciVelez on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 09:49:11 AM EST

Yeah, it's pretty much what I've always wanted (2.00 / 2)

I've continually been extremely disappointed in the partisan nature of our politics.  Everyone is out to serve a constituency instead of working for all Americans.  Obama is the first presidential candidate I've ever seen in my adult life that made me think that he understands that the presidency isn't a sword but a plowshare.

Squabbling doesn't help us.  Punking your opposition doesn't really help us.  Demonstrably knowing your shit and keeping your head in a crisis DOES help us.  Obama understands these things, and we're finally ready for him.


The pebbles have voted and the avalanche has begun.

President-Elect "That One"

by Dracomicron on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 09:49:45 AM EST

I can't agree more. (none / 0)

And the more dems that get aboard this philosophy, the better. If Obama does win, I hope we won't see a repeat of the '93 caterwauling from myriad special interests, each of which felt that their time had finally come.

"The presidency isn't a sword but a plowshare" - well put.


It is not because I cannot explain that you won't understand. It is because you won't understand that I cannot explain. - Elie Wiesel
by Sumo Vita on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 09:24:51 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Do you get it? (2.00 / 1)

I too noticed in the debate he didn't get into he said/he said back and forth with McCain.  And McCain told some whoppers.  But as I was sitting there I realized that the pundits, Obama's surrogates and ads would analyze what McCain said and make him eat (regret?) his words.

Obama has something else McCain doesn't -- patience.  McCain has to get the last word in on the spot, he just can't help himself.  Obama realizes the last word sometimes comes much later.  


That One is the Right One for 2008.
by GFORD on Thu Oct 16, 2008 at 03:32:25 PM EST


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.